Offensive security

Penetration Testing

Test realistic paths into the environment, demonstrate consequence safely and give the team evidence it can use to close the gaps.

Isolated test laptop connected to a network appliance.

The engagement

Prove which paths are exploitable

A vulnerability scan identifies possible weaknesses. A penetration test asks whether those weaknesses can be used together to reach a defined objective, cross a trust boundary or gain access that should not exist.

GDF testers work within written rules of engagement. They validate findings, preserve the evidence behind each result and stop at the level of impact authorized for the test. The report separates exploitable paths from isolated observations and includes a practical order for remediation and retesting.

Scope

  • External penetration testing

    Controlled testing of internet-facing systems, exposed services and identity paths from an outside perspective.

  • Internal and assumed-breach testing

    Validation of segmentation, privilege escalation, lateral movement and access to agreed objectives.

  • Identity and access testing

    Testing of authentication, authorization, administrative paths, trust relationships and common identity attack chains.

  • Cloud attack-path testing

    Review and controlled validation of permissions, exposure and administrative paths in supported cloud environments.

  • Detection validation

    Safe activity designed to show what security controls and response processes can observe within the agreed scope.

  • Remediation retesting

    Focused verification of corrected findings, with closure evidence suitable for technical and governance review.

Methodology

How the test runs

  1. Frame

    Agree objectives, safety boundaries, prohibited actions, contacts and evidence handling.

  2. Discover

    Map exposed and reachable attack paths using current information and controlled validation.

  3. Demonstrate

    Prove consequence only to the point authorized and necessary to support the finding.

  4. Prioritize

    Order remediation by path, exposure and consequence; retest the fixes that matter.

Evidence commonly examined

Evidence reviewed

  • Rules of engagement and target inventory
  • Validated request, response and command evidence
  • Identity and privilege paths
  • Network and segmentation observations
  • Detection and response records
  • Remediation and retest evidence

What you can expect

What you receive

  • Executive risk narrative
  • Technical findings with reproducible evidence
  • Attack-path and consequence mapping
  • Prioritized remediation plan and retest record

Frequently asked

Common questions

Is this the same as a vulnerability scan?

No. Scanning can inform discovery, but penetration testing validates conditions, combinations and consequence through controlled human analysis.

Can you test production systems?

Sometimes, under explicit rules designed for the environment. High-availability and OT systems may require passive, lab-based or tightly limited methods.

Do you guarantee no vulnerabilities remain?

No finite test can do that. We define the tested scope, period, methods and limitations so the result is not overstated.

Talk with an examiner

Discuss the matter and the next step.

Call to discuss timing, scope and the safest way to share information. Do not send evidence or credentials by email.

24/7 hotline: 1-800-868-8189

Privacy center

Choose your site settings

Optional technology stays off until you choose otherwise. You can change these browser settings at any time. Access to the core site does not depend on optional technologies.

Technology preferences
Sale or cross-context sharing: not used GDF does not sell or share website personal information for cross-context behavioral advertising.