Operational technology

OT, ICS & SCADA Security Assessments

Understand how the control environment actually works, where trust crosses boundaries and which changes reduce consequence without undermining operations.

Water treatment and electrical utility infrastructure.

The engagement

Review architecture before touching live systems

OT security cannot be reduced to finding unpatched devices. Architecture, process criticality, remote support, safety systems, legacy protocols, recovery capability and the ability to observe an incident all affect risk.

GDF uses interviews, documentation, passive observation and carefully governed validation to build an evidence-based view of the environment. Recommendations are sequenced around operational feasibility and consequence.

Scope

  • Architecture and zone review

    Document conduits, trust relationships, dependencies and gaps between enterprise, DMZ, control and safety environments.

  • Asset and communication visibility

    Assess the accuracy of inventories and the organization’s understanding of normal connections and protocols.

  • Remote access and identity

    Review vendor, employee and administrative pathways, authentication, authorization, monitoring and revocation.

  • Segmentation validation

    Evaluate policy and, where safe, validate whether defined boundaries prevent unauthorized paths.

  • Monitoring and forensic readiness

    Assess evidence sources, time synchronization, retention and examination access inside the OT environment.

  • Recovery and change control

    Review backups, configuration baselines, restoration testing, spares and authorization of control-system changes.

Methodology

How the assessment runs

  1. Contextualize

    Understand the process, safety functions, availability requirements and critical operating states.

  2. Observe

    Review evidence and passively map assets, communications and trust paths where practicable.

  3. Validate

    Test selected assumptions only within agreed operational boundaries.

  4. Sequence

    Prioritize architectural, procedural and monitoring improvements by consequence and feasibility.

Evidence commonly examined

Evidence reviewed

  • Network and system architecture
  • Asset and software inventories
  • Firewall and remote-access configurations
  • Passive traffic and monitoring data
  • Backup and restoration records
  • Vendor, maintenance and change procedures

What you can expect

What you receive

  • Current-state architecture and trust map
  • Risk findings tied to operational consequence
  • Prioritized remediation roadmap
  • Executive and engineering briefings

Frequently asked

Common questions

Do you perform active scans in OT environments?

Not by default. Active methods require explicit engineering approval and may be inappropriate. Passive and documentation-based approaches are often the starting point.

Can you assess an environment with legacy systems?

Yes. The goal is not to pretend every asset can be patched; it is to identify compensating controls, exposure, monitoring and recovery options.

Will the report work for executives and engineers?

We provide a concise decision narrative and enough technical evidence for the teams responsible for implementation.

Talk with an examiner

Discuss the matter and the next step.

Call to discuss timing, scope and the safest way to share information. Do not send evidence or credentials by email.

24/7 hotline: 1-800-868-8189

Privacy center

Choose your site settings

Optional technology stays off until you choose otherwise. You can change these browser settings at any time. Access to the core site does not depend on optional technologies.

Technology preferences
Sale or cross-context sharing: not used GDF does not sell or share website personal information for cross-context behavioral advertising.