Miami and Latin America corridor
Cross-Border Evidence Handling in the Miami Corridor
Preservation, collection, and transfer for matters where records sit across the Miami and Latin America corridor. The technical workflow is designed against the transfer mechanism counsel selects and against the local rules the records are subject to.
The engagement
What the Cross-Border Evidence Handling engagement covers
Miami is the working hub for a large volume of matters that cross into Latin America. Records at issue may sit with affiliated entities in Mexico, Central America, the Andean region, Brazil, or the Southern Cone. Custodians travel between the region and Miami. Vendors, correspondent banks, and shipping counterparties add another layer of records that live under a different legal regime than the matter itself. Collection, access, custody and transfer requirements must be planned for each source and country.
GDF coordinates preservation, collection and transfer with local counsel and the client's affiliates. Counsel determines the lawful route for the country, source and proceeding, which may involve documented consent, voluntary production or an applicable court-based procedure. Criminal mutual legal assistance treaty requests use designated governmental authorities; they are not an ordinary collection route for private litigants. GDF provides the agreed technical workflow and does not select the legal transfer mechanism.
Confirm US and foreign source owners, lawful access, retention risks and the people qualified to perform the work in each location. Collection and coordination begin only when the required authority and arrangements are established; neither side is assumed to be preserved merely because intake has begun.
Scope
Corridor evidence map
A written map of the record sources on both sides of the corridor: US-side tenants and systems, foreign-side tenants and systems, shared services and vendors, custodian device populations, and the entities and individuals that hold access. The map identifies which records sit under which entity and jurisdiction so counsel can decide the transfer mechanism for each.
US-side preservation and collection
Preservation and collection of Miami-side and other US-side records under standard forensic protocols: cloud tenant holds, endpoint imaging, mobile device collection, SaaS platform export, and structured-data extraction. Chain of custody is documented from the source system to secure storage.
Foreign-side coordination
Coordination with local counsel and the foreign affiliate's IT team on preservation and collection under the mechanism counsel selects. Where GDF is authorized to perform the collection abroad, work is scheduled around local operations. Where a local vendor or the affiliate's own team performs the collection, GDF sets the protocol, checklist, and quality-control review so the collection is defensible under both regimes.
Transfer, storage, and access
Evidence transfer is scheduled against the mechanism counsel selects. Physical media transfer, encrypted electronic transfer, and secure storage on the US side or the foreign side are configured against the requirements the transfer mechanism carries. Access logs to the evidence are maintained so counsel can show who touched what.
Language and processing
Identify the languages, source formats and purpose of review before agreeing processing. Preserve original text alongside any normalized fields or translated copy, recording transformations and fields the source does not supply. Qualified Spanish, Portuguese or other language reviewers and any certified translation must be confirmed separately for the matter.
Reporting for counsel and the court
Reports document the evidence map, the transfer mechanism used for each source, the collection and processing record on both sides, and the chain of custody. Where the matter reaches a court that will assess the collection, the record is prepared so counsel can walk the court from the source system to the exhibit.
Evidence commonly reviewed
Evidence reviewed
- Corridor evidence map with entities, systems, and jurisdictions
- US-side collection and cloud tenant preservation records
- Foreign-side collection records and quality-control review
- Transfer records tied to the mechanism counsel selected
- Chain-of-custody records for the life of the matter
- Processing and review-platform loading records for merged populations
What you receive
Deliverables
- Written corridor evidence map with counsel-facing options
- Collection reports for US-side and foreign-side sources
- Transfer record aligned to the selected mechanism
- Merged review population loaded to the platform of choice
- Chain-of-custody record for the life of the matter
- Expert report where the matter requires testimony on the workflow
Engagement workflow
How the engagement runs
Scoping and evidence map
The engagement opens with a written map of the record sources on both sides of the corridor: US-side tenants and systems, foreign-side tenants and systems, shared services and vendors, custodian device populations, and the entities and individuals that hold access. The map identifies which records sit under which entity and jurisdiction so counsel can decide the transfer mechanism that fits each source and the matter's schedule. The evidence map is a working document that is updated as new sources are identified during the engagement.
US-side preservation and collection
US-side preservation and collection runs under standard forensic protocols. Cloud tenants are placed on hold at the platform level where the environment supports it. Endpoint imaging, mobile device collection, SaaS export, and structured-data extraction are scheduled against custodian availability. Short-retention sources are prioritized because retention on some of them is measured in days. Chain of custody is documented from the source system to secure storage on the US side.
Foreign-side coordination
Foreign-side preservation and collection is coordinated with local counsel and the foreign affiliate's IT team under the mechanism counsel selects. Where GDF is authorized to perform the collection abroad, work is scheduled around local operations and travel logistics. Where a local vendor or the affiliate's own team performs the collection, GDF sets the written protocol, the checklist, and the quality-control review that keeps the collection defensible under both regimes. The record documents which party performed each step and under what authority.
Transfer, storage, and access
Agree any transfer, receiving environment, permitted access, encryption, storage and custody record under the route counsel selects. A local privacy assessment or authority request may need further evidence; the collection scope does not guarantee that no additional work will be required.
Processing, review, and reporting
The processing record identifies each original population, language, export format and transformation, with unsupported items and review exceptions visible. Confirm the qualified language participant and any translation requirement before assigning the population. Reporting retains the source map, counsel-selected transfer route, collection and processing history and custody path; a normalized field does not establish lawful transfer or translation accuracy.
Frequently asked
Common questions on Cross-Border Evidence Handling
Do you decide the transfer mechanism for foreign records?
No. Counsel selects the lawful route for the country, source and proceeding, such as documented consent, voluntary production or an applicable court-based procedure. GDF documents the agreed technical collection and transfer. Criminal treaty requests use the designated governmental authorities; they are not an ordinary private collection service.
Can GDF perform the collection on the foreign side?
Where GDF is authorized to perform the collection abroad, work is scheduled around local operations. Where a local vendor or the affiliate's own team performs the collection, GDF sets the protocol, the checklist, and the quality-control review that keeps the collection defensible.
How is local data protection law considered?
Local data protection law shapes the transfer mechanism, the notification requirements, and the handling of personal data during the collection and transfer. Counsel and local counsel determine the applicable law and the required steps. The technical workflow is designed to fit those steps and to produce a record counsel can use to support any assessment.
Can Spanish and Portuguese review populations be staffed?
Identify expected languages and verify the actual material during processing. Spanish, Portuguese and other language support requires confirmation of the qualified reviewer, availability, review purpose and any translation or certification requirement. Preserve original-language records and distinguish machine assistance from a human-reviewed or certified translation.
How is the technical record prepared for court?
The record documents the evidence map, the transfer mechanism used for each source, the collection and processing record on both sides, and the chain of custody. Where the matter reaches a court that will assess the collection, the record is prepared so counsel can walk the court from the source system to the exhibit.
Identify the country, authority and missing approvals
Start with the country, proceeding, source owner, record type, date range, retention and the purpose of transfer. Counsel selects the lawful private route. DOJ describes criminal MLATs as unavailable to private parties, including criminal defendants.
- Identify who can authorize access on each side and whether local counsel, a provider or a separately qualified examiner is required.
- Record transfer and privacy restrictions, approved recipients, hosting location and retention before evidence crosses a border.
- An illustrative source register can distinguish a US mailbox preserved, a foreign vendor export awaiting authority and an account record no longer retained.
- Keep original language and source context; translation and authentication requirements are agreed for the actual proceeding.
DOJ: criminal MLAT limits and civil or defense evidence routes
Talk with an examiner
Talk with the local team
Tell us where the people, devices or retaining team are located and the matter you need help with.
Since 1992 · 24/7 dispatch · Court-tested experts
Talk with an examiner
Discuss the matter and the next step.
Call to discuss timing, scope and the safest way to share information. Do not send evidence or credentials by email.
24/7 hotline: 1-800-868-8189