Technical methods and scope
Catch Format, Numbering and Metadata Problems Before the Other Side Does
The problems that stall a production are rarely dramatic. A date field exported in the wrong format, a Bates range that skips, an attachment separated from its parent email, a text file that still holds the words beneath a redacted image. Any one of them gives the receiving side a reason to reject the set or to ask pointed questions about the care taken with everything else. We treat production as its own technical phase after review decisions are final, and we validate the package against the specification and against the source records before counsel authorizes release.
Global Digital Forensics has served clients since 1992, from AmLaw 100 firms to small practices producing their first electronic set, and from Fortune 1000 companies to the midsize business that has never seen a load file. We own the software we use to process and produce, which lets us build productions around the matter and its budget rather than around a platform minimum. The validation and exception record we hand over gives the producing party a clear, documented basis for saying the production is complete and in the agreed form.
Choose the Format and Prove It Imports
We agree on the native, image, text and load file requirements with the legal team and confirm what the receiving system actually accepts before assembly begins. A TIFF production typically carries extracted or OCR text alongside a Concordance, Summation or EDRM XML load structure, while a native production carries the metadata load file that ties each delivered item to its fields. PDF delivery can include searchable text and document metadata when the specification allows it.
Most modern productions are hybrids: images for the bulk of the documents and native files for spreadsheets, audio, video or anything else that loses its meaning when flattened. Relativity deliveries use the .dat and .opt pairing with the agreed fields and image links. Packages for the SEC, the DOJ, the FTC or a state attorney general are built only after their current instructions and any custom format are confirmed, because regulator specifications change and an outdated template is an avoidable failure. In every case a sample import against the real receiving environment is the test we trust and the one we document.
Call (800) 868-8189 or send the discovery schedule to plan the work around it.
Build the Privilege Log Alongside the Review, Not After It
Where counsel wants a privilege log, we develop the entries and the exceptions while coding is under way and reconcile them against the withheld set and the production record before delivery. That ties the approved log to the documents actually held back and to the Bates ranges actually produced, which is where privilege logs usually fall apart.
The log follows the fields, categories and any governing order set in the protocol. The technical record can include the document or Bates identifier, date, document type, custodian, author, recipients, the approved privilege ground and a factual description written to describe the document without disclosing its protected content. We apply that specification consistently and route anything unresolved to the responsible legal reviewer. Where categorical logging is approved, the workflow applies the agreed categories, reconciles the counts and prepares whatever supporting record counsel directs.
Verify Every Redaction in Image, Text and Log
A redaction has to hold in three places at once: the image the reader sees, the text layer a search engine reads and the log that explains why. We check placement on the page, confirm the permanent image output, confirm the redacted words are gone from the extracted text and reconcile each redaction with its log entry before the package is released.
The redaction log records the document identifier, the affected Bates pages, the reason code and the application date, which supports protected health information, personal data and confidential business information under one consistent record. Original unredacted material stays under the matter's access, retention and custody controls, so it is available if a redaction is challenged and is never part of the delivered set.
Ask a discovery specialist how this fits your matter; the first consultation is free.
Track Rule 502(d) Clawbacks So Counsel Can Act Quickly
When counsel supplies an applicable Rule 502(d) order and a written clawback protocol, we track the designated items, implement the approved technical corrections to the package and preserve the records counsel needs for the notice process.
The clawback record identifies the document, the date it was flagged, the date counsel sent notice, the recipient's confirmation of return or deletion and any related proceedings. Those records stay with the matter file so the disclosure and the response can be assessed without reconstructing the sequence from email.
Bring the specification and the deadline to a free initial consultation and we will test the import before the export runs.