Technical methods and scope
Cloud Collections You Can Explain, Run on Software GDF Owns
Global Digital Forensics has served counsel since 1992, from AmLaw 100 firms and Fortune 1000 companies to small businesses facing their first discovery demand. GDF owns its software and develops the internal tools we collect and process with, which lets us scale a cloud collection to the matter rather than to a platform’s minimum fee and keep the handling of your client’s data under our own control.
Every engagement begins with custodians, accounts, tenants, dates, data types and the approved scope, and ends with a collection record that identifies the source authentication, the administrative role used, the filters, the API or export path, the time of collection, the exceptions and the transfer integrity values. The receiving team, whether that is your reviewers, a review platform or opposing counsel, can read that record and understand exactly what the package represents.
Email, Business Suites and Cloud Storage
We collect supported Gmail, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 and on premises email sources, and file scope can extend to the configured cloud storage repositories your client actually uses. Before collection we confirm product and connector support, available data types, metadata, retention and administrator access against the provider, the license and the tenant, because each workload leaves the platform by its own route and the license decides which routes are open.
We preserve native mailbox and file items with their available metadata, applying the custodian, date, folder, label or repository filters approved for the matter. The exception record identifies throttling, inaccessible items, deleted content retention windows and export limits, so the handoff carries its true coverage and nobody discovers a gap in a deposition.
Send the custodians and the deadline and the first call sets the collection plan.
Slack, Teams, Zoom and Collaboration Data
Collaboration platforms are where the candid conversations happen, and they are also where exports most often lose the thread. For Slack, Microsoft Teams and Zoom we confirm which messages, threads, edits, reactions, attachments, recordings, transcripts and participant records are available under the platform, the retention policy, the license and the administrator role, then plan a collection that records conversation relationships so a reviewer can follow a message to its replies and its attachments in context.
Search and Prepare the Collection for Review
Once the sources are preserved we search, remove recognized standard system files where appropriate, deduplicate and prepare native, image, text or load file formats for the review workflow the legal team has chosen. Because the processing runs on software we own, unnecessary volume is removed before it reaches hosting or reviewers, which is where most discovery budgets are actually spent. Where AI assists selection, we document the search logic, the sampling, the human decisions and the exclusions. Every filter traces back to an instruction in the review protocol, so the processing record reads as a set of approved decisions.
Describe the sources and the production format, and a senior specialist will map the collection.
Document the Collection and the Handling of the Evidence
Delivery can include collection logs, authenticated source details, integrity values, exceptions, reconciliation, processed volumes and an export manifest. Hash values prove each package arrived unchanged, and the reconciliation and exception records show how completely the provider answered the request. If the collection has to be explained to a court, our examiners have testified in federal and state courts and can describe the method in a declaration, at deposition or at trial. Call (800) 868-8189 to talk through the sources before anything is exported.
If a call is awkward today, send the tenants, the custodians and the deadline in writing and an examiner will come back to you with a collection plan.