Technical methods and scope
Collect the Business Evidence Held on Phones and Computers
Global Digital Forensics has served law firms and companies since 1992, and our examiners have testified in federal and state courts about how device evidence was collected. Text messages, Signal and WhatsApp conversations, calendar entries, browser history, file movement and USB activity hold business evidence that never reaches the mail server, and in discovery those records have to be collected in a way that can be explained later to the other side and to the court.
Our collection record documents the selected method, the provenance, any source changes and the coverage, so another qualified examiner can assess the material. The plan confirms the exact device, the available access and the supported method, and identifies where a deeper examination would need laboratory work, which lets the legal team separate an obtainable record from a proposed recovery task before committing to the cost.
Method Selection Guided by NIST SP 800-101 Rev. 1
NIST guidance on mobile device forensics addresses validation, preservation, acquisition, examination, analysis and reporting, and we plan against it while confirming the actual device, operating system version, source state and validated tool support for the matter at hand. Logical, file system, physical, backup and cloud methods have different coverage, and the record names exactly what the chosen method reached.
The method follows the question. A discovery request for business texts over a defined period calls for a different collection than a trade secret matter that turns on deleted files, and the proposal names the method we recommend and what it is expected to return.
Ask a discovery specialist how this fits your matter; the first consultation is free.
iPhone, Android, Windows and Mac, Collected by Certified Examiners
Veronica Perez, a Senior Computer Forensic Specialist, focuses her work on the collection, preservation and examination of mobile device evidence. She is an EnCase Certified Examiner and a Paraben Certified Mobile Phone Examiner with Cellebrite CCLO and CCPA certifications, served in law enforcement from 2001 to 2016 before private practice and has provided mobile forensics instruction for the California Department of Justice Advanced Training Center. Robert Knudsen brings hundreds of computer and mobile device examinations in federal and state court matters. The examiner who collects the device is the examiner who explains it.
For iPhone and iPad, supported logical, advanced logical or file system methods are selected against the exact hardware, software, state and credentials, and the record identifies what was obtained and what was inaccessible. Android collection covers Samsung, Google Pixel and other supported devices, with the method and tool version confirmed for the particular model. Windows imaging uses write protection and verified E01 or AFF4 images, or remote targeted collection where a full image is unnecessary. For macOS we account for T2 and Apple Silicon protections and for APFS snapshots, Unified Logs and application databases. Tablets, watches and other connected endpoints are assessed for the records their platform actually retains.
Remote Collection While the Phone Stays in Use
For supported phones, the custodian connects the phone to a compatible computer, opens the collection link we send and follows the prompts with a GDF examiner guiding each step. The data transfers securely to GDF and the phone normally stays in use throughout. A remote collection takes anywhere from a few minutes to overnight depending on the amount of data and the setup, and many custodians start it before bed and wake to a finished collection. Nothing is shipped, nobody travels and no one is without a phone for a week.
For distributed laptops and desktops, a supported remote method collects targeted Windows or macOS records over an approved connection, with the custodians, dates, file types, directories, collection window and any installation or removal of the collection component defined in advance. We document the parameters, the transfers, the output integrity checks, the exceptions and any changes the live operating system or user activity introduced, so the result can be interpreted in context. We confirm compatibility before starting and tell you plainly when a question needs the deeper methods only a laboratory can provide.
Tell us the devices, the applications and the deadline and we will confirm which can be collected remotely, which need a visit or a laboratory and what each will return.
When a device does need the laboratory, the custodian is usually without the phone for 24 to 48 hours while it is with us, with shipping time additional, and the device's condition and extraction requirements can affect that schedule.
Get a Free Consultation Call (800) 868-8189
Verify Integrity and Document Custody
A reliable handoff documents source changes, integrity checks and custody continuity. We use a validated write blocking method where the source and method support it, record acquisition and file integrity values, verify the collected material at transfer and at examination and account for each material transfer from collection through delivery. Live mobile, memory and remote collection can change the source, so each change is written into the record before cross examination can ask about it.
The report pairs the hash values with a coverage statement, so the other side sees both integrity and scope. When expert support is in scope, the assigned examiner addresses the documented method, the integrity checks and the custody record in an affidavit, at deposition or at trial.
Attorneys who want to know which certified examiner would collect the devices and explain the method can review the forensic team and their certifications.