Litigation and Enterprise Case Study

Insurance Company Systems Examination for State Regulators

A State Regulator was in the middle of an extensive examination of an insurance company that fell under its jurisdiction. The insurance company was suspected of engaging in certain activities that may have been in violation of certain state and federal regulatory guidelines. The insurance regulators had been working on the examination for a number of months until the examination finally reached a phase where the analysis of particular computer systems was necessary to find out more information. The insurance company, not wanting to lose its ability to do business or jeopardize its license, had up till then cooperated with the state regulators, albeit indirectly. The state regulators had conducted a few onsite interviews, had reviewed documents supplied to them by the insurance company and had begun to build a file with respect to particular activities at the insurance company. However, the regulators had difficulty obtaining and interpreting all of the information, procedures and practices of the insurance company due to the company’s intense use of computerized systems in every aspect of its business. The insurance company also was doing business in other states, and regulators from those states were in similar predicaments. The computer systems used by the insurance company were state of the art and the functionality and use of those systems were way beyond the expertise of the regulators. The regulators knew that in order to ferret out the truth regarding what the insurance company was doing behind the scenes, those systems must be reviewed and analyzed.

Corporate Examination

Bagged hard drive beside a forensic write blocker.
Matter type
Corporate Examination
Evidence involved
computers

Forensic Engagement and Methodology

Global Digital Forensics, Inc. (“GDF”) was contacted by the state regulators to assist their examination team. GDF staged its examination in two parts. First, GDF analysts used general and hard to find public information to build a digital dossier on the insurance company and its many affiliates and associated individuals. These results were gathered and presented to the state regulators before proceeding to the second phase, the onsite examination of the insurance company’s digital assets, including extensive interviews with the insurance company’s technology staff, operations personnel, as well as an intense review of the computer systems being used at the insurance company.

Resolution and Courtroom Outcome

GDF first reviewed public and digital resources associated with the insurance company and its affiliates. Onsite work included interviews with IT and operations staff and examination of available computer systems, documents and industry materials. Inconsistencies between sources led the regulators to ask further questions and expand their review.

The findings were shared with the relevant regulatory parties, and a multi state review followed. The examination helped the regulators connect business practices to system records.

Related

Complementary Forensic and Security Services

Confidentiality

Client identities and sensitive details are omitted. The organization is described generically, and no client mark appears on this site. Details are preserved from the original case record.

Talk with an examiner

Consult a Senior Examiner on Business System Evidence For A Regulatory Review

Describe the systems, records and questions the examination team needs to reconcile. We arrange a secure way to share evidence after we speak.

Since 1992 · 24/7 dispatch · Court tested experts

Or call (800) 868-8189

Email or phone is required. For an active incident, please call. Read what we send with the request.

Talk with an examiner

Request a Confidential Case Assessment

Call to discuss timing, scope and the safest way to share information.

24/7 hotline: (800) 868-8189

Reviewed by Joseph Caruso, Founder, CEO and CTO, CISSP. Last reviewed .

Privacy center

Choose your site settings

Optional technology stays off until you choose otherwise. You can change these browser settings at any time. Access to the core site does not depend on optional technologies.

Technology preferences
Sale or cross-context sharing: not used GDF does not sell or share website personal information for cross-context behavioral advertising.